ZenGRC Pricing, Features and SOC 2 Frameworks (2026)

ZenGRC takes a centralized view of governance, risk and compliance, offering a cloud platform for managing controls, automating audit work and tracking risk across multiple frameworks. Its pitch rests heavily on commercial terms: flat, all-inclusive pricing with unlimited users and unlimited vendors. The profile points toward mid-market and enterprise organizations that manage several compliance programs and want one system to hold them.

For SOC 2, ZenGRC is software only. It organizes controls and evidence and supports audit preparation, but the audit is carried out by an independent CPA firm that the customer engages separately. Implementation is expert-guided, and each customer is assigned a named Customer Success Manager. The platform also includes AI-powered control assessments and vendor management as part of the standard offering rather than as paid extras.

Published framework coverage includes SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST and NIST CSF, though a total framework count and an integrations count are not published. Whether a trust center, policy templates or questionnaire automation are included is not documented in the available data. ZenGRC carries a 4.4 out of 5 rating on G2 from 102 reviews. The company does not publish prices, but it states there are no per-user, per-framework or per-vendor charges. Third-party estimates place a start-up plan around $30,000 a year, professional plans between roughly $30,000 and $42,000, and enterprise plans at $72,000 or more.

Organizations with many internal stakeholders or a large vendor base may see value in the unlimited-seat structure, since costs do not climb as more people or suppliers are added. The entry point, however, sits well above what many SaaS-focused automation tools are reported to charge, which makes it a harder fit for early-stage companies pursuing a first SOC 2 report. Prospective buyers should confirm integration coverage for their own stack and ask directly which features are included, given the gaps in public documentation.